Journal Entry

March 17, 2003

:: Sick ::

I'm pretty sure I'd never want to live, for very long, anywhere but the US. The freedoms and opportunities we have here are quite extensive, the land is big and beautiful, and the people are lovely.

Today, though, I'm having a tough time believing in my country.

This bellicose behavior by Bush and the other hawkish leaders of this so-called representative democracy is making me sick. We are supposed to be champions of freedom, respectful of the rights of human beings. Oh, except when those human beings don't agree with exactly what "we" want to do.

The UN doesn't want to pass a resolution of war? Okay, we throw down an ultimatum and tell everyone else to get the hell out, or face mortal danger. Even if the UN did try pass a resolution, France wants to veto it? Okay, France is a lily-livered country of cowards. Let's rename our french fries freedom fries.

Is Saddam Hussein out of his mind? Is he terrible? Has he killed his own people in the past, continuing to rule with an iron fist? Yes, yes, and yes. Would Iraq be better off without him? Probably, although there are no guarantees.

However, if we drop 3000 bombs in the first several hours on Iraq, whose safety is virtually guaranteed? Who is the one person in the entire country who is not going to get killed by any of those weapons of mass destruction? That's right, kids, it's Hussein.

If there were some way just to get rid of Hussein, I might be able to support it. He is a disgusting dictator who does terrible things to his own people. Unfortunately, there's no such option in the real world. And there's no way he's leaving Iraq. Bush knows it -- this business of not going to war if he leaves would be laughable if only it were funny.

If this war starts ("if" sounds so hollow), we are going to have yet another reason never to leave our borders. We may be free here, but as citizens of the world we are far from it. There are lots of places where Americans aren't safe to travel. I know a lot of the people who pose us danger are lunatics, but being an American is not necessarily something to be unequivocally proud of these days. People all over the world are either afraid of us, disgusted by us, or both. What gives us the right to fly over to a country who has never fired a shot at us, or otherwise threatened our security in any meaningful way, and drop a shitload of bombs?

Divine providence? Is God Himself appearing to George Bush telling him that this is the Right Thing To Do? I don't think so.

Bush and the rest are using fear tactics, bribery, and in some cases outright lies to try to bend the wills of the American people, the leaders of other countries, and the people of Iraq. Our military is prepared to absorb a lot of "collateral damage", civilian casualities, in order to break the will of Iraq's civilians and military, to end a war faster. To try to encourage them to overthrow Hussein, I guess.

So, we're willing to kill a bunch of civilians to get rid of a dictator who will be hidden safe away in a bunker surrounded by his imposters and lackies who will gladly be killed before him. We seem not to care that this war is unjust and unsupported anywhere in the world.

So tell me, when did we become the aggressors? Is it wrong to call what we're doing terrorism? How? Someone give me a reason to be proud of my country's leadership today. It just makes me sick.

Open Letter to Bush
No War Blog
Chicago Anti-War

Comments

To say that we are the aggressors in this instance is to say that Saddam Hussein and the countrymen who support him are not culpable for the last 12 years of their inactivity. Lets not forget that for the last 12 years we have continued to be militarily engaged with Iraq policing the “No Fly Zone” just to contain Saddam from trying to reach out again all while UN sanctions failed, and he thumbed his nose at all diplomatic / peaceful efforts to disarm. One only has to go to feed the children websites, and unicef web sites over the past eight years to see accounts of how the Iraqi government misappropriated relief efforts for their own gain.

I watched peace rallies on cspan this past weekend looking for some glimmer of hope that someone might have some other solution than a military conflict but they rang hollow appearing to purport peace with no solution other than to just not have a war.

I am by no means a war monger but my views on war are tempered with my moms stories of how personal friends of hers were spirited out of Germany, through Holland while their parents were gassed during world war 2. To sit back and do nothing after 12 years of trying, is to ignore the fact that while being begged to enter world war 2 in support of France and Britain it took pearl harbor to make it so.

Regardless of an opinion, or the level of disappointment, with war immanent I hope people won’t forget to support those who are fighting to make it possible for you to express your opinions freely.

www.uso.org
www.vfw.org
www.militarymoms.net just to name a few

wilson

Posted by Wilson at March 19, 2003 8:11 AM

"What gives us the right to fly over to a country who has never fired a shot at us, or otherwise threatened our security in any meaningful way, and drop a s***load of bombs?"

How about an assasination attempt on the first Pres. Bush? That's fairly meaningful in my book.

I think Saddam has killed far more of his own people than this war will. A dictator who commits such vile crimes against humanity needs to be gotten rid of, one way or another. Is there a better way to do it? (other than assasination, which, theoretically, is illegal).

A reason to be proud of (y)our country's leadership? We will give food and medicine to Iraqi civilians. We will help them rebuild into a free country. Will innocents die in this war? Probably, and I pray it doesn't happen. But far more lives will be saved with regime change than in letting Saddam continue his torture and genocide.

Posted by Jeff at March 20, 2003 3:36 PM

I appreciate your comments Joe...

Being a woman & having a daughter, I would not want to live in Iraq. If I did, I would want this war to free us. Even if it meant it would cost me my life.

Joe, these people have just as much right to live free as we do. No one has come up with another way to stop Hussein.

And to Wilson's comments - Amen!


Posted by Darcy at March 20, 2003 3:58 PM

I think that President Bush is doing a wonderful job and that we should support his decisions. If we aren't the aggressors then they will be and the war will be fought in America.

Posted by grants at March 20, 2003 4:54 PM

This is a hot topic today, and rightfully so.

Jenny (grants), I understand supporting the administration in wartime, but do you really believe that a war with Iraq is going to be fought here? Please tell me how that's possible, because as far as I know, it really isn't. Terrorism? Yes, although even that is difficult, and remember that no Iraqis were involved in 9/11. Conventional war? Highly unlikely. We are the most powerful military force in the world, and that's the reason we can effectively conduct combat that far from home. Iraq doesn't have that capability.

Posted by Joe at March 20, 2003 5:17 PM

The Gulf War coincided with a bomb threat at my middle school. Just as we were ushered across the street to the high school auditorium, a fighter jet went overhead. Naively some of us thought (a) that the jet might drop a bomb on our school and (b) that it was an Iraqi jet.

Even half an hour after the fact, both of these ideas seemed utterly absurd. A bomb, if it had actually existed (it didn't), would have been planted, not dropped. The jet was probably practicing for the annual air show. Or maybe it wasn't a fighter jet at all, but a single passenger plane or a passenger jet.

Fear was all that counted. Fear plus naivete made anything seem possible, even Saddam Hussein bombing my suburban middle school. Fear and naivete are what make "a war fought in America, " at this time, seem like a real possibility.

For better or worse, realism suggests that we are snug as bugs in rugs here in the States. I wish I could say as much for our armed forces overseas and the civilians of Iraq.

Posted by Lisa at March 20, 2003 7:35 PM

Regarding previous comments.

Is a thwarted assassination attempt worthy of a major military commitment like this one? You'd better hope not, or we'll be sending the Marines to every country on earth, and many other countries would similarly be obligated to send their troops here.

Sanctions have killed people too. Saddam's people have probably killed more, but he's hardly the only one who has put the Iraqis through the wringer. We should try to remember that.

Can anyone tell me just what plans we're talking about for rebuilding Iraq once the war is over? Rebuilding a country is very expensive. There's still a hell of a lot of work to do in Afghanistan, and even more work will be needed in Iraq. Defense spending is way up, but I don't think big enough portions of it are going to reconstruction. We will help them a good bit, yes, but I'm not convinced we'll be able to completely make up for the damage we're causing. And let's not even get into the fact that there isn't actually any money to pay for this anyway. Remember all those tax breaks we're getting? You can't cut taxes and simultaneously increase spending. At least, not without the serious consequences our states, schools, and other institutions are already facing.

The Iraqis most definitely deserve freedom as much as any people on earth. They have had to put up with Saddam for far too long. However, international cooperation and negociation to that end is critically important. Stomping in there as we are doing (along with the UK and a couple others) with most of our support being "symbolic" from the other countries, only reinforces the rampant anti-Americanism that causes terrorist groups to set us in their sights. Yes, they hate us merely for being free and not following their ideologies, but the way we're going about things is not helping our cause one bit. This is not a diplomatic administration.

I would never choose to live in Iraq, and I feel very lucky to be where I am. But I do not agree that the end (a better Iraq) is completely justified by the means (deception, strongarm tactics, and bribery). There are better ways to go about it. Going to war would be much more acceptable if we could garner more real support from the rest of the world.

How long will it take for us to realize that we have to work voluntarily with other countries to make world peace an attainable goal? We can't do it alone.

Posted by Joe at March 22, 2003 1:14 AM

"Is a thwarted assassination attempt worthy of a major military commitment like this one?"

I guess that depends upon whose Dad it is.

Posted by Mark at March 23, 2003 5:56 PM

Very useful comments - good to read

David

Posted by David at April 24, 2004 2:24 AM

Post a comment

Name:

Email Address:

URL:

Comments: